Sunday, August 7, 2011

The Telecom App Revolution

The surge of apps on the i-phone, android and others makes for a tremendous business case. I mean who was missing the telephone applications till 5 years ago? Let alone that, who was missing the 3-G and the 4-G networks in the first place? At least not the millions of people using it now. Heck, not even thousands of those who test out early-beta versions of these apps even when they are not stable or recommended.
The telecom companies had excess bandwidth, and they didn't know how to monetise it because there were not so many subscribers. So they needed a way to increase the usage per subscriber and that was not going to happen with voice. Then data came in, trickling at first and then flooding all of a sudden. There was always a basic need to let people be connected all the time and mobile phones helped us connect through voice calls. The early adopters of mobile phones, people who were on the move, needed internet connections to check email anyway. They carried a laptop and a mobile phone which was speaking for itself like an opportunity. So, the first applications helped people connect to internet for email. When it really became affordable, people started devising other ways of using this. People on trains used it to check on news, others used it to chat. People used their idle time to play online games, others used it to catch up on emails.
Enterprising people took it as an opportunity and started writing applications that made it easy for people to do these things and much more. And when you hear of people doing financial transactions on the mobile, and new age banks propagating their apps to people for banking, you know that "internet on mobile" has really come of age.

Dual Pricing of Diesel for pasenger cars

I was just reading this article the other day (http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/energy/oil-gas/carmakers-fume-over-government-plan-for-dual-pricing-of-diesel/articleshow/9488287.cms) and have been following the developments over internet and TV. The talk on this thing has been on for more than a year now and I am surprised how such an "accomplised bunch of policy makers" cannot take a call on this any sooner. I understand from the "political angle" that they are trying to make a consensus by sending feelers to the general public. But hey, there are more important things to take care of in this country. Why don't they just add a "cess" to this whole business of selling diesel cars and consider it done? D-UH ? Or am I missing something here?

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

No to Emailing ?

I was just reading this article where the author claims to quit emailing (http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/06/i-wouldnt-say-ive-been-missing-it/) and that really got me thinking. So what is wrong with email? It was regarded as one of the greatest inventions of the internet age and so many of us owe our daily bread to it.
You just have to go to a government office to see what happens when there is no email. The only way you can reach an officer in the government office is by queuing in front of him, seeking his full attention and then trying to say your point in as few words as possible and backed with as much documentation as possible. Only if people who wanted to get something done from me were that way. Instead, I get all my queries through email. What is wrong with it? Here it is:
a) You can send me an email even if others are writing emails to me at the same time and imagine that you have my undivided attention
b) You can send me an email even if I am sleeping, ill, tired or on vacation and wait for a reply
c) You imagine that I would have understood what you meant just because I didnt reply. Or alternatively, you would imagine that I have ignored your email because I didnt reply quickly enough (according to your benchmarks)
I guess you get the idea !!

Happy emailing ! Adios !